{"id":8504,"date":"2024-05-17T18:57:18","date_gmt":"2024-05-17T18:57:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/drdavidcring.net\/descartes-ideas\/?page_id=8504"},"modified":"2025-08-08T07:57:10","modified_gmt":"2025-08-08T07:57:10","slug":"dtoi-relevant-contemporary-sources","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/drdavidcring.net\/descartes-ideas\/dtoi-relevant-contemporary-sources\/","title":{"rendered":"DTOI Relevant Contemporary Sources & Descartes Bibliographies"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
Primary Sources<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n
Secondary Sources (A\u2013L)<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n
Secondary Sources (M\u2013Z)<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n
Descartes Bibliographies<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Relevant Contemporary Sources<\/h1>\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n

\"A Block<\/a>, Ned<\/a><\/strong> \"An. \u201cQualia<\/a>.\u201d In A Companion to Philosophy of Mind<\/a><\/em> \"An<\/a>, edited by Samuel<\/a> Guttenplan<\/a> (no known photo), 514\u201320. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1994.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n

\"A <\/span>Bourget<\/strong><\/a>, David<\/a><\/strong> \"An<\/a>. “The Representational Theory of Consciousness<\/a>.” PhD dissertation Australian National University, January 2010. Chair<\/a>: David Chalmers<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n

\"A <\/span>Bourget<\/strong><\/a>, David<\/a> <\/strong>\"An<\/a> and Angela<\/a> Mendelovici<\/a><\/strong> \"A<\/a>. “Phenomenal Intentionality<\/a>.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy <\/em>(Fall 2019 Edition), edited by Edward N<\/a>. Zalta<\/a> \"An<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n

\"A Burge<\/a>, Tyler<\/a><\/strong> \"An<\/a>. “Anti-Individualism and Perceptual Representation: Interview With Tyler Burge<\/a>.” Interviewed by Carlos<\/a> Mu\u00f1oz-Su\u00e1rez<\/a> \"A<\/a>. Europe’s Journal of Psychology<\/em> 10, no. 4 (2014): 589\u201397. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5964\/ejop.v10i4.767.
<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n

\"A Burge<\/a>, Tyler<\/a><\/strong> \"An<\/a>. “Cartesian Error and the Objectivity of Perception<\/a>.” <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Reprinted in Burge’s collected papers from 1975 \u20132003: Foundations of Mind: Philosophical Essays, Volume 2<\/a>. Boston: MIT Press (2007): 192\u2013207.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n

\"A Byrne<\/a>, Darragh<\/a><\/strong> \"An<\/a>. \u201cMetaphysics of Mind<\/a>.\u201d (Last reviewed December 1, 2022. Last modified: May 10, 2010. DOI: 10.1093\/OBO\/9780195396577-0076).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n

Carruthers, Peter. “Cartesian Epistemology: Is the Theory of the Self-Transparent Mind Innate?<\/a>.” The Journal of Consciousness Studies<\/em> 15, no. 4 (2008): 28\u201353.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n

\"A Carruthers<\/a>, Peter<\/a> <\/strong>\"An<\/a>and Rocco<\/a> Gennaro<\/a><\/strong> \"A<\/a>\"An<\/a>. “Higher-Order Theories of Consciousness<\/a>.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy <\/em>(Fall 2023 Edition), Edward N<\/a>. Zalta<\/a> \"An<\/a> and Uri<\/a> Nodelman<\/a> \"A<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n

\"A <\/span>Curley<\/a>, Edwin<\/a> M<\/a><\/strong>. \"A<\/a>. “Locke, Boyle, and the Distinction between Primary and Secondary Qualities<\/a>.” The Philosophical Review<\/em> 81, 4 (Oct., 1972: 438\u201364.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n

\"A <\/span>Davies<\/a>, Martin<\/a><\/strong> \"For<\/a>. \u201cConsciousness and the Varieties of Aboutness<\/a>.\u201d In Philosophy of Psychology: Debates on Psychological Explanation<\/a><\/em> \"An<\/a>, edited by \"\"<\/a> Cynthia<\/a> Macdonald<\/a> \"An<\/a> and Graham<\/a> F<\/a>(rank). Macdonald<\/a> \"A<\/a>. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1995.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n

\"A <\/span>Embry<\/a>, Brian<\/a><\/strong> \"A<\/a>. \u201cAn Early Modern Scholastic Theory of Negative Entities: Thomas Compton Carleton on Lacks, Negations, and Privations<\/a>.\u201d British Journal for the History of Philosophy<\/a><\/em> 23, no. 1 (2015): 22\u201345. Fat<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

Abstract<\/a>:<\/strong> Seventeenth century scholastics had a rich debate about the ontological status and nature of lacks, negations, and privations. Realists in this debate posit irreducible negative entities responsible for the non-existence of positive entities. One of the first scholastics to develop a realist position on negative entities was Thomas Compton Carleton. In this paper I explain Carleton’s theory of negative entities, including what it is for something to be negative, how negative entities are individuated, whether they are abstract or concrete, and how they affect their subjects. I argue that for Carleton, negative entities are conceived as spatially extended simples that affect their subjects by means of spatial overlap. I also show how Carleton responds to some theological worries about his realism concerning negative entities.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n

\"A <\/span>Harman<\/a>, Gilbert<\/a><\/strong> \"An<\/a>. \u201cIs There Mental Representation?<\/a>.\u201d In Perception and Cognition Issues in the Foundations of Psychology<\/a>, Volume 09<\/a> \"\". Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, (1978<\/a>): 57\u201364.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n

\"A <\/span>Jacob<\/strong><\/a>, Pierre<\/a><\/strong> \"The<\/a>. “Intentionality<\/a>.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy <\/em>(Spring 2023 Edition), edited by Edward N<\/a>. Zalta<\/a> \"An<\/a> and Uri<\/a> Nodelman<\/a> \"A<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n

\"A Kind<\/a>, Amy<\/a><\/strong> \"An<\/a>. \u201cQualia<\/a>.\u201d In The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy<\/a><\/em>, September 27, 2023.<\/p>\n\n\n\n